Sarah Kofman


Sarah Kofman

Sarah Kofman (14 September 1934 – 15 October 1994) was a French philosopher whose work moved between Nietzsche, Freud, aesthetics, the question of woman, and the afterlife of the Holocaust in language. Born in Paris on Rosh Hashanah to Polish Jewish immigrants, she became a professor at the Sorbonne and the author of nearly thirty books. Her writing is marked by close, often corrosive readings of canonical texts and by a late, spare autobiographical turn that treated survival itself as a problem of speech.


Her father, Bereck Kofman, was a Hasidic rabbi who had emigrated with his wife, Fineza, from Poland to France in 1929. On 16 July 1942 he was arrested at the family home on Rue Ordener by the French police and deported; he was murdered at Auschwitz. Sarah, then seven, and her mother spent the rest of the Occupation in hiding. For much of that time Sarah lived with a Christian woman she called Mémé, a divorcée on Rue Labat who became a second mother. After the Liberation a custody struggle opened between Mémé and Fineza Kofman. The two street names later supplied the title of Kofman’s final book, *Rue Ordener, Rue Labat* (1994), which recounts the years from roughly eight to eighteen in an almost childlike register. In *Paroles suffoquées* (*Smothered Words*, 1987), dedicated to her father, she described herself as a Jewish intellectual who had survived the Holocaust and suggested that her many books had been detours necessary before she could tell “that.”


She trained as a philosopher in the postwar French system, earning the agrégation and working successively with Jean Hyppolite, Mikel Dufrenne, and Gilles Deleuze. Her third-cycle thesis, published in 1970 as *L’enfance de l’art* (*The Childhood of Art*), offered a non-reductive reading of Freud’s aesthetics. Her state doctorate drew on already published work and was supervised by Deleuze. From 1960 she taught in Toulouse, then in Paris. Around 1968–69 she met Jacques Derrida and began attending his seminars at the École Normale Supérieure. She joined the faculty of the University of Paris I (Panthéon-Sorbonne) in 1970, rising from lecturer to professor, though she received a full chair only in 1991. She was among the early participants in the Collège International de Philosophie. Colleagues placed her alongside Derrida, Jean-Luc Nancy, and Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe as a reader shaped by phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and deconstruction, yet her voice remained distinct: less programmatic, more attached to the detail of texts and to the comic or violent reversals they contain.


Her philosophical production clusters around a few sustained interlocutors. Nietzsche occupies the longest arc. *Nietzsche et la métaphore* (1972; English *Nietzsche and Metaphor*) treats metaphor not as ornament but as the operative mode of Nietzsche’s writing, undoing the privilege of the concept. Later volumes, *Nietzsche et la scène philosophique* (1979) and the two-part *Explosion* (1992–93), follow *Ecce Homo* line by line, reading Nietzsche’s self-presentation as a staged explosion of the unified author. In *Le mépris des Juifs* (1994) she examined Nietzsche’s remarks on Jews and antisemitism without either exonerating or simplifying them. Freud is the other constant. Beyond the aesthetics book, *Quatre romans analytiques* (1974; *Freud and Fiction*) and *L’énigme de la femme* (1980; *The Enigma of Woman*) track how psychoanalytic concepts are produced inside literary and theoretical texts. *The Enigma of Woman* remains one of the most detailed confrontations with Freud’s writings on female sexuality, neither a dismissal nor a defense. She also wrote on the joke (*Pourquoi rit-on?*, 1986), on the “impossible profession” of analysis, and on the ways speculative philosophy borrows from and conceals psychoanalytic motifs.


A third thread is the place of woman inside philosophy. *Aberrations: Le devenir-femme d’Auguste Comte* (1978) follows Comte’s late “feminization” as a symptom of the positivist order. *Le respect des femmes (Kant et Rousseau)* (1982) argues that the respect those thinkers officially grant women functions as a distancing mechanism continuous with misogyny. Across these studies Kofman was interested both in “the woman at the interior of philosophy” and in male philosophers’ repression of femininity in themselves. She extended the same suspicious reading to Socrates (*Socrate(s)*, 1989), to Rousseau, Kant, and Diderot, to Nerval’s repetitions, and to painting—Rembrandt’s *Anatomy Lesson*, portraits, the melancholy of art. Ideology, the camera obscura, and the visual field appear in *Camera obscura: De l’idéologie* (1973). Literature and philosophy are not separated; each is used to unsettle the other’s claim to mastery.


The autobiographical texts do not stand outside this practice. *Smothered Words* incorporates a historical list of deportees that includes her father’s name and reflects on the difficulty of writing after Auschwitz, in dialogue with Blanchot and others. *Rue Ordener, Rue Labat* opens with the fountain pen her father left behind and the police raid, then narrates the split between two mothers, two languages, two diets, two streets. Kofman insisted that her autobiography was not to be found elsewhere than in the bibliography itself; the memoir is both an exception and a confirmation of that claim. Shorter pieces such as “Tomb for a Proper Name” mix dream, proper names, and the problem of translation. The Holocaust is not treated as raw experience awaiting philosophical commentary; it appears as a pressure on citation, on the name, and on the possibility of a continuous “I.”


On 15 October 1994, the 150th anniversary of Nietzsche’s birth, Kofman died by suicide in Paris at the age of sixty. She was survived by her partner of twenty-five years, Alexandre Kyritsos. Derrida later wrote that she had been without pity, if not without mercy, for both Nietzsche and Freud, whose works she knew inside and out. The coincidence of the date has been noted by commentators; it remains an observation rather than an explanation.


Her legacy is that of a reader who refused to separate the life of concepts from the life that concepts fail to master. English translations of major works—*The Childhood of Art*, *Nietzsche and Metaphor*, *The Enigma of Woman*, *Freud and Fiction*, *Smothered Words*, *Rue Ordener, Rue Labat*, *Socrates*—and the 2007 *Selected Writings* have made parts of the corpus available beyond French. She is read today in feminist theory, Holocaust studies, Nietzsche scholarship, and deconstructive aesthetics, often by those who treat her less as a commentator on others than as a philosopher whose method was the unfaithful fidelity of close reading. The detours, she suggested, were the way the unsayable entered the record at all.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post